World News Insights
1-3 Minute Gist

All Topics Article

Report blasts Japan’s preparation for, response to Fukushima disaster - The Washington Post

Washington Post Original article ›

Keywords:

LyrArc Article Gist
An independent parliamentary panel in Japan described the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster as a "profoundly man-made disaster." It was sharply critical of TEPCO, the company running the plant, and the Japanese government's response. The investigation chairman Kiyoshi Kurokawa said in the report: "What must be admitted- very painfully- is that this was a disaster 'Made in Japan,' its fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained conventions of Japanese culture: our reflexive obedience; our reluctance to question authority; our devotion to 'sticking with the program'; our groupism; and our insularity." This comes as a report by TEPCO shifted public attention to "a tsunami beyond our imagination," creating a large credibility gap with the Japanese people, because the public is skeptical about TEPCO's attention to safety during the period leading to the accident. The parliamentary report calls attention to safety factors that were ignored so that companies would be required to take further steps including costly modifications of plant equipment. A critical flaw was the lack of a independent safety agency that could enforce safety measures that TEPCO might be reluctant to make because of cost considerations. Astonishing as this may sound, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) in Japan is part of the same government ministry that promotes nuclear power, creating a sort of "nuclear bloc," which before the accident connected the safety agency to the bloc. Because of this the panel report says, NISA did not require TEPCO to prepare for a full station blackout- the loss of main and backup power- because the "probability was small." Other factors that need to be addressed are the breakdown in communication and cooperation between the people operating the plant and the people responsible for Japan's nuclear safety. The prime minister's office waited too long before declaring a state of emergency. To come up with the conclusions the panel made 1000 intervews and conducted 900 hours of hearings. The questions left behind by the nuclear accident in Japan are whether Japan should continue with the same level of dependence on nuclear power, whether it should shift out of nuclear power on a gradual basis as Germany is doing ironically after the Fukushima accident while Japan is reactivating its nuclear plants to meet energy needs. If Japan continues with a smaller reliance on nuclear power what changes have to take place for an effective safety agency completely outside the "nuclear bloc," and the series of other changes that have to take place in the nuclear power industry's handling of safety. Public opposition continues to focus on this because of distrust of the nuclear power industry after the accident.

The July 2012 Report of the independent parliamentary panel in Japan on the Fukushima Nuclear Plant disaster

06/11/2010

The report says the accident was "a profoundly man-made disaster," and a disaster 'Made in Japan.' " It is sharply critical of TEPCO and the Japanese government response. A critical flaw is the location of the safety agency NISA inside the same ministry that promotes nuclear power, thus associating the agency with the 'nuclear bloc' in Japan and dangerously compromising its performance. The Japanese people have a growing skepticism that the nuclear industry will make the changes needed for safety.

Grouped Articles

Chinese Walls, Pocked With Peepholes

New York Times 06/11/2010

Report blasts Japan’s preparation for, response to Fukushima disaster - The Washington Post

Washington Post 07/06/2012

Japan Fukushima Nuclear Crisis Called ‘Man-Made’

New York Times 07/05/2012

Thousands Gather in Tokyo to Protest Nuclear Restart

New York Times 07/16/2012

Video Shows View Inside Nuclear Disaster

Wall Street Journal 08/07/2012

Japan Weighs End to Nuclear Power

Wall Street Journal 08/22/2012

Areva after the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster in Japan

06/21/2011

Grouped Articles

France Warns of Nuclear Industry Shake-Up After Areva Loss

New York Times 02/23/2015

Areva Sees Huge Write-Down

Wall Street Journal 12/12/2011

France's Election Heats Up over Nuclear Power

BusinessWeek 12/01/2011

French nuclear energy: Under pressure

Economist 12/17/2011

China Nuclear Firm Plans Up to $27 Billion IPO

Wall Street Journal 06/06/2012

Report blasts Japan’s preparation for, response to Fukushima disaster - The Washington Post

Washington Post 07/06/2012

Naoto Kan, Japan's prime minister during the Fukushima nuclear disaster, and nuclear policy in Japan following the accident

06/10/2010

Kan told a parlimentary inquiry in May 2012, that Japan should not use nuclear power. He said "the nuclear village," referring to nuclear power companies, bureaucrats and researchers, had hijacked Japan's nuclear policy and was trying to put Japan back on the same course. He cited the days following the accident when it got to the point where the evacuation of Tokyo was considered, getting to the "verge of national collapse."

Grouped Articles

Support for DPJ Recovers

Wall Street Journal 06/10/2010

Chinese Walls, Pocked With Peepholes

New York Times 06/11/2010

The Oil Disaster Is About Human, Not System, Failure

Wall Street Journal 06/11/2010

Japan Whips Incumbents

Wall Street Journal 07/10/2010

Japan in a Post-Growth Age

New York Times 12/02/2013

Abe Pick Wins Poll For Tokyo Governor

Wall Street Journal 02/10/2014

Safety record and maintenance practices at the Fukushima nuclear plant

06/11/2010

A Wall Street Journal analysis of the safety record of this plant with a 1970's design nuclear reactors. The safety record is worse than other plants in Japan, the analysis shows. Experts say the maintenance practices at the plant contributed to the meltdown of the nuclear reactors, as the spent fuel was removed from the nuclear vessel during maintenance. In the U.S. the spent fuel is kept inside the reactor vessel for maintenance, to give extra protection. See practices for storing spent fuel rods of China and Germany, which differ from Japan and US practice.

Grouped Articles

The Oil Disaster Is About Human, Not System, Failure

Wall Street Journal 06/11/2010

Japan Plant Had Troubled History

Wall Street Journal 03/21/2011

Officials Expect 'Ups and Downs' in Reactor Fight

Wall Street Journal 03/21/2011

Fukushima Plant Warnings Went Unheeded

New York Times 03/21/2011

Japan Ignored Warning of Nuclear Vulnerability

Wall Street Journal 03/23/2011

Nuclear Plants Fail to Report Defects, Report Says

Wall Street Journal 03/24/2011

Spread of radioactive elements from Japan's nuclear reactor in Fukushima

03/17/2011

American flights over the plant estimate radioactive elements in a zone of 16 miles from the plant.

Grouped Articles

Radiation Spread Seen; Frantic Repairs Go On

New York Times 03/17/2011

Japan Plant Had Troubled History

Wall Street Journal 03/21/2011

Tokyo Warns on Water

Wall Street Journal 03/23/2011

Radioactivity Spreads to Nearby Areas

Wall Street Journal 03/26/2011

Japan’s Nuclear Crisis Is Seen Clearly From Afar

New York Times 04/02/2011

Japan Utility Dumps Radioactive Water

Wall Street Journal 04/05/2011

The containment system for GE's Mark 1 Nuclear Reactors

03/15/2011

The containment system for GE's Mark 1 Nuclear Reactors is not as robust as other reactors. It is cheaper to build. But it creates unacceptable risks in the event of a failure in the reactor's cooling systems, as ocurred at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan.

Grouped Articles

Design of G.E.'s Mark 1 Nuclear Reactors Shows Weaknesses

New York Times 03/15/2011

U.S. Calls Radiation ‘Extremely High’ and Urges Deeper Caution in Japan

New York Times 03/16/2011

Spent Fuel Rods at Plant Pose Big Risk

Wall Street Journal 03/17/2011

Deconstructing the Japanese Nuclear Plant Design

New York Times 03/19/2011

Lessons From Chernobyl for Japan

New York Times 03/19/2011

Bid to 'Protect Assets' Slowed Reactor Fight

Wall Street Journal 03/19/2011

An account of the events of the March 2011 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear plant disaster in Japan

03/15/2011

Grouped Articles

Abe Pick Wins Poll For Tokyo Governor

Wall Street Journal 02/10/2014

Setback in Reactor Fight

Wall Street Journal 03/16/2011

Workers at Fukushima Plant Brave Radiation and Fire

New York Times 03/15/2011

Japan Renews Nuclear Efforts as U.S. Sounds Alarm

Wall Street Journal 03/17/2011

Spent Fuel Rods at Plant Pose Big Risk

Wall Street Journal 03/17/2011

Lessons From Chernobyl for Japan

New York Times 03/19/2011

Nuclear crisis planning in Japan 2012-2015

03/19/2012

Grouped Articles

Japan's Nuclear Crisis Plan Still Lags

Wall Street Journal 03/19/2012

Japanese Struggle With Shape of Nuclear Regulation

Wall Street Journal 03/27/2012

Japan Assesses Older Nuclear Plants

Wall Street Journal 05/02/2012

Japan's Ex-Premier, Naoto Kan, Condemns Nuclear Power

New York Times 05/28/2012

Report blasts Japan’s preparation for, response to Fukushima disaster - The Washington Post

Washington Post 07/06/2012

Video Shows View Inside Nuclear Disaster

Wall Street Journal 08/07/2012

Regulatory failures in the nuclear industry in Japan

06/15/2011

Grouped Articles

Former Inspector Complains of Regulators' Practices

Wall Street Journal 06/15/2011

Design Flaw Fueled Nuclear Disaster

Wall Street Journal 07/01/2011

Japanese Struggle With Shape of Nuclear Regulation

Wall Street Journal 03/27/2012

Japan Assesses Older Nuclear Plants

Wall Street Journal 05/02/2012

Japan’s Leaders Fret as Nuclear Shutdown Nears

New York Times 05/03/2012

Japan's Ex-Premier, Naoto Kan, Condemns Nuclear Power

New York Times 05/28/2012

The Response of TEPCO and the Japanese government to the nuclear disaster

03/18/2011

The use of low-tech measures such as flooding with seawater, fire trucks with hoses, helicopters with water, a huge extension cord to restart cooling systems, give the appearance of a a desperate effort to prevent the reactor meltdown. The public's lack of confidence in Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) which owns the nuclear reactors.

Grouped Articles

Japan’s Try-Anything Nuclear Response Draws Criticism, and Sympathy

New York Times 03/18/2011

Bid to 'Protect Assets' Slowed Reactor Fight

Wall Street Journal 03/19/2011

Japan Reassures, Others Flee

Wall Street Journal 03/18/2011

U.S. and Tokyo Spar on Depth of Crisis

Wall Street Journal 03/18/2011

Japan's disaster: A crisis of leadership, too

Economist 03/26/2011

Amid Fight to Stem Threat, Tepco Worker's Email Reveals Personal Struggle

Wall Street Journal 03/28/2011


Support LyrArc

We took a different way to help millions around the world build educated informed mindsets that affects and shapes their lives. For a future that is open, global and digital, with everyone having access to high quality information. We believe in the renewal of America, renewal of Europe, the renewal of India, the rest of Asia, Latin America and Africa. The renewal of our supply chains, health, education, infrastructure, as we rebuild our countries after the pandemic. Literacy and knowledge we believe cannot thrive and grow in a world of web bots, web crawlers, or AI. This requires human curiosity, human learning, and human imagination. We take as inspiration the saying- “One has to be free, and as broad as sky. One has to have a mind that is crystal clear, only then can truth shine in it.” Every contribution whether big or small is precious- in this crisis and ahead.

Support Lyrarc from as small as $1


Copyright © 2006 - 2026 Intelilinks LLC
Terms and Conditions | Copyright Policy | Privacy Policy | Contact Us