World News Insights
1-3 Minute Gist

All Topics Article

Roberts Straddles Ideological Divide

Wall Street Journal Original article ›

Keywords:

LyrArc Article Gist
Experts say Chief Justice Roberts somehow found a path through in bridging the ideological divide and avoiding a show of partisanship in an election year. He somehow navigated and found a path through in his vote on the U.S. healthcare law letting it stand. Early on Roberts advocated "judicial modesty and humility" in jurisprudence. He compared the judge's role to that of an umpire in baseball during the 2005 confirmation hearings. The umpire would not pitch or bat, his job would be to call balls and strikes. It was seen as a determmined show of independence at a time when Justice Kennedy was seen as the swing vote. He has also earned political capital to be able to vote independently on other issues before the court instead of becoming embroiled in controversy about the role of the Court in overturning the work of Congress during the early part of the Obama administration.

Chief Justice Roberts and the U.S. Supreme Court

01/18/2009

Grouped Articles

Health Care Is Defining Decision for Chief Justice Roberts

New York Times 06/28/2012

Chief Justice John Roberts’s health-care ruling gets plenty of second-guessing - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

Charles Lane: John Roberts’s Compromise of 2012 - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

The Radical Supreme Court

New York Times 06/30/2012

Verdict on Kagan’s first year on Supreme Court - The Washington Post

Washington Post 09/26/2011

Kagan and Roberts: Similar Paths, Poles Apart

Wall Street Journal 08/06/2010

The U.S. Supreme Court and the Affordable Care Act (Obama U.S. health care law)

11/03/2011

Grouped Articles

Health Care Is Defining Decision for Chief Justice Roberts

New York Times 06/28/2012

Chief Justice John Roberts’s health-care ruling gets plenty of second-guessing - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

The Radical Supreme Court

New York Times 06/30/2012

What the Supreme Court Challenge Means for the Health-Care Law

Wall Street Journal 03/03/2015

Justices Divided at Health-Law Argument

Wall Street Journal 03/05/2015

Some Supreme Court Justices Cite 2012 Argument Against Health Care Law as Defense for It Now

New York Times 03/08/2015

U.S. Supreme Court and other legal rulings affecting the pharmaceutical industry.

10/27/2008

The Wyeth vs. Levine and other rulings by the Supreme Court that affect pharmaceutical companies, and how they respond to meeting norms of proper behaviour that are expected of the companies.

Grouped Articles

In Drug Case, Justices to Weigh Right to Sue

Wall Street Journal 10/27/2008

High Court Eases Way to Liability Lawsuits

Wall Street Journal 03/05/2009

Supremes Set Different Rules for Suing Device, Drug Makers

Wall Street Journal 03/04/2009

Ruling Ripples Beyond Drug Firms

Wall Street Journal 03/05/2009

44 Percent of Americans Approve of Supreme Court in New Poll

New York Times 06/07/2012

Roberts Straddles Ideological Divide

Wall Street Journal 06/29/2012


Support LyrArc

We took a different way to help millions around the world build educated informed mindsets that affects and shapes their lives. For a future that is open, global and digital, with everyone having access to high quality information. We believe in the renewal of America, renewal of Europe, the renewal of India, the rest of Asia, Latin America and Africa. The renewal of our supply chains, health, education, infrastructure, as we rebuild our countries after the pandemic. Literacy and knowledge we believe cannot thrive and grow in a world of web bots, web crawlers, or AI. This requires human curiosity, human learning, and human imagination. We take as inspiration the saying- “One has to be free, and as broad as sky. One has to have a mind that is crystal clear, only then can truth shine in it.” Every contribution whether big or small is precious- in this crisis and ahead.

Support Lyrarc from as small as $1


Copyright © 2006 - 2026 Intelilinks LLC
Terms and Conditions | Copyright Policy | Privacy Policy | Contact Us