World News Insights
1-3 Minute Gist

All Topics Article

Chief Justice John Roberts’s health-care ruling gets plenty of second-guessing - The Washington Post

Washington Post Original article ›

Keywords:

LyrArc Article Gist
Chief Justice Roberts let the Obama healthcare law stand arguing that the individual mandate for everyone to carry health insurance acted as a tax, and was on these grounds constitutional. Justice Roberts found middle ground by first rejecting the Obama's administration's argument that asking every American to buy health insurance was legal under the commerce clause, and following this with the a non partisan approach that found the mandate legal under the tax clause. Roberts was guided by the writings of an eminent legal authority, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Roberts referred to this in his opinion saying: "It is well established that if a statute has two possible meanings, one of which violates the constitution, courts should adopt the meaning that does not do so." Legal scholars speculate whether Roberts changed his vote later on or whether the Justice had used the questions in the hearings on the law to explore the idea that the law could be constitutional on different grounds. During the arguments in the hearings Roberts said: "The idea that the mandate is something separate from whether you want to call ita penalty or tax just doesn't seem to make much sense."

Chief Justice Roberts and the U.S. Supreme Court

01/18/2009

Grouped Articles

Health Care Is Defining Decision for Chief Justice Roberts

New York Times 06/28/2012

Chief Justice John Roberts’s health-care ruling gets plenty of second-guessing - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

Charles Lane: John Roberts’s Compromise of 2012 - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

The Radical Supreme Court

New York Times 06/30/2012

Verdict on Kagan’s first year on Supreme Court - The Washington Post

Washington Post 09/26/2011

Kagan and Roberts: Similar Paths, Poles Apart

Wall Street Journal 08/06/2010

Views expressed after the Supreme Court hearings in March 2012 on the U.S. health care law by the Washington Post and other media

03/30/2012

Grouped Articles

Health Care Is Defining Decision for Chief Justice Roberts

New York Times 06/28/2012

Chief Justice John Roberts’s health-care ruling gets plenty of second-guessing - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

The Supreme Court’s civics lesson - The Washington Post

Washington Post 03/30/2012

Obama Warns Supreme Court

Wall Street Journal 04/03/2012

44 Percent of Americans Approve of Supreme Court in New Poll

New York Times 06/07/2012

Past Denials of Vulnerability Raise Health Act What-Ifs

New York Times 06/23/2012

Legal aspects and challenges to the Obama Health Care Law that may have been overlooked by the Obama administration

06/23/2012

Grouped Articles

Chief Justice John Roberts’s health-care ruling gets plenty of second-guessing - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

A Federal Budget Crisis Months in the Planning

New York Times 10/05/2013

Past Denials of Vulnerability Raise Health Act What-Ifs

New York Times 06/23/2012

Unwanted Label of 'Tax' Saves Health Measure

Wall Street Journal 06/29/2012

The Obama U.S. health care law, the Affordable Care Act of 2012, and public support- 2012-2017

03/23/2012

An average of major public opinion polls compiled by Real Clear Politics website shows 50.5% of Americans opposed the U.S. health care law in March 2012. By 2017 with high premiums and high deductibles the Obama Affordable Care Act was not seen by middle class as the solution to healthcare needs, though it helped the uninsured and the poor with subsidies. The Republican plan of Speaker Ryan and the House was seen as not sensitive to the needs of low income older Americans even as it sought to bring down premiums. As one middle class American, Mr. Riffle, in a 2017 survey by the Washington Post put it- the problem was the high cost of medical care in the U.S. and pricing of healthcare, until members of Congress used the plans on the insurance exchanges not much would happen to benefit most people.

Grouped Articles

Chief Justice John Roberts’s health-care ruling gets plenty of second-guessing - The Washington Post

Washington Post 06/30/2012

A Federal Budget Crisis Months in the Planning

New York Times 10/05/2013

In Rural Iowa, Spending, Not the Shutdown, Raises Worry

New York Times 10/04/2013

Tension and Flaws Before Health Website Crash

New York Times 11/22/2013

Uninsured Skeptical of Health Care Law in Poll

New York Times 12/18/2013

The Unwisdom of Barack Obama

Wall Street Journal 09/20/2014


Support LyrArc

We took a different way to help millions around the world build educated informed mindsets that affects and shapes their lives. For a future that is open, global and digital, with everyone having access to high quality information. We believe in the renewal of America, renewal of Europe, the renewal of India, the rest of Asia, Latin America and Africa. The renewal of our supply chains, health, education, infrastructure, as we rebuild our countries after the pandemic. Literacy and knowledge we believe cannot thrive and grow in a world of web bots, web crawlers, or AI. This requires human curiosity, human learning, and human imagination. We take as inspiration the saying- “One has to be free, and as broad as sky. One has to have a mind that is crystal clear, only then can truth shine in it.” Every contribution whether big or small is precious- in this crisis and ahead.

Support Lyrarc from as small as $1


Copyright © 2006 - 2026 Intelilinks LLC
Terms and Conditions | Copyright Policy | Privacy Policy | Contact Us