LyrArc Article Gist
Weymouth interviews Colombian President, Juan Manuel Santos. Santos was finance minister, foreign trade minister, and defense minister under former president Alvaro Uribe. The U.S. is negotiating a free trade agreement with Colombia. Santos has improved relations with neighboring Venezuela, which under Uribe were strained upto the breaking point. He is also improving relations with Ecuador, and working to strengthen the Andean Development Council. Santos says Colombia has a smaller drug problem after defeating the major cartels, though mini-cartels still operate in the country. On fiscal responsibility Colombia has introduced a rule in the constitution to limit deficits to 1% of GDP. Santos expects 5% growth in 2011. He hopes to protect Colombia's growth in a global financial crisis by strengthening regional reserve funds, multilateral cooperation of Andean countries, and central bank monetary policies. Santos plans to abolish the DAS intelligence agency in 3-4 months. He plans to create a new intelligence agency and transfer functions such as immigration that were under DAS to other agencies. He has also launched investigations and action against corruption in the government and against public officials working with local mafias. To do this he is working with the attorney general, prosecutor general, the controller general, and police. This has led to criticism from Uribe who sees the changes in policy pointing to deficiencies in the Uribe administration. Colombia is a country with a population of 46 million and plays a significant role in the northern part of Latin America. Santos assumed office in 2010 and was the choice of Alvaro Uribe. His policies have won him a 71% approval rating....

LyrArc Article Gist
Economist's analysis of the American stock market as it stands in January 2007. World awash in liquidity. Could this change? Corporate profits at an high, could this change? What will the housing market weakness do in 2007 and 2008? Are there any complex financial instruments that might falter in 2007? Will risky assets always outperform and volatility remain low or will things change? Questions posed here. Note from 2007 November 27. The housing market took a downturn by mid year. The credit markets felt a severe jolt in the third quarter of 2007 and a credit crunch ensued. And the new financial instrument or delivery vehicle subprime mortgages packaged into securities and sold by premier institutions like Citigroup as AAA safe investments around the world, including it so happens to 3 Arctic towns in Norway by brokerage firm there. Using a network of financial affiliates to do this in a off balancesheet fashion, all blew up by November 2007. The adjustable rate mortgages were set to adjust by mid year 2008 and lead to an acceleration of foreclosures in 2008 which had already climbed up in 2007. Things can get sour quickly and financial markets felt this especially because no oone knew how much of these risky securities other parties in the markets were holding resulting in a general level of mistrust. Leading to a choking up of the financial institutions in USA and Europe and central bank intervention in both places, successful for the time being in stemming the problem. Another part of this crisis is the global effect of the subprime mortgage losses so that financial institutions around the world were affected. ...

LyrArc Article Gist
Christine Lagarde, head of the IMF, asked financial markets to give time for individual countries to use political processes to come up with solutions. She said: "It would be ideal and it would be lovely from a market perspective if it was not just currrently but immediately signed, sealed and delivered, done deal, overnight. Unfortunately, for those of you who have the privilege of belonging to democracies, things do not happen in that way and things do take time and have to go through parliamentary processes."

LyrArc Article Gist
The BW Economics editor Peter Coy loks at what economist have to say and finds Akerloof (Nobel 2001) and Robert Solow (Nobel 1987) in favor of strong stimulus, with Solow saying that it is too small. Prescott of Arizona State (Nobel 2004) favors tax cuts and roll back of regulation for growth. Most economic forecasters who are more concerned about being right rather than some ideological bias say stimulus is necessary. Coy's view from years of watching the markets at work is that the risk of doing too little now are way too great, and this is no time to think in terms of ideological bias of any sort. Misdiagnosing this downturn could have devastating consequences and lead to something like the Great Depression. Its in this context that comments by Prescott that "people are now a little more hungry for jobs, its great I can get some work done on my house," implying that now they would work for less, and show a cavalier disregard of what is happening in the factories, in the streets and neighborhoods, in the workplaces, inthe country, and is too casual for a crisis of this magnitude. Which may be why one fourth of Republicans have more confidence in President Obama's economic plan than in the Republican approach in a CBS/NYTimes poll taken at beginning of April 2009. Adam Smith in the Wealth of Nations cites this type of comment by employers in his day, in the Wealth of Nations, and says that this is a shortsighted approach not what would make England as a nation prosper and grow. ...

LyrArc Article Gist
In response to the claim that pay caps will mean losing talent, some experts from the banking industry and some veterans say that in addition to there not being many alternative jobs, and the need to lower their sights like everyone else for bankers, it will result in losing those who are in banking for the money and keeping those who love the work. The other thing veterans in the banking industry pont out is that if the industry loses some of the older people there will be younger people who will be eager to take on the responsibilities.

LyrArc Article Gist
Astra Zeneca faces over 9000 lawsuits from people who developed diabetes after taking it. Its a drug for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia that has sales of $20 billion over the years, with $4 billion in 2008. Now it is revealed that Astra Zeneca conducted studies on the effectiveness of Seroquel from 2000, and these studies show that Seroquel was less effective than a generic medicine haloperidol, that has been around for 50 years. Seroquel was only more effective than a placebo,the analysis says from hundreds of pages of unsealed documents.

LyrArc Article Gist
The US House of Representatives voted 328 to 93 to pass abill that says any bonuses to employees of firms receiving government help would be taxed at 90% of the payments above $125,000, through aspecial tax. The purpose is to prevent abuses like the one at AIG where bonuses of $469 million were going out to AIG employees, when AIG was a financial disaster sucking up $!70 billion in government funds already.

LyrArc Article Gist
Michael Kinsley of Washington Post points out that the $469 million of bonuses to AIG FInancial Products employees was first seen in SEC filings in November 2009, then on Rep Cummings blob on the Huffington Post November 27 entry. It was reported in the Washington Post in an article headlined "AIG Spa Trip Fuels Fury on Hill", and in the New York TImes on October 17, titled " AIG lets New York Review the Propriety of its Pay Packages", so where was everybody then? Its as if noone knew about till last week when all hell broke loose. Kinsley refutes the argument that as AIG CEO Liddy suggested that the employees only take half of the bonuses, by asking the question: bonuses for what? For creating a black hole in which government rescue funds have to be poured of $170 billion, the largest rescue in history, and then these skills to create black holes needed so badly in the midst of a near Depression that they be kept from leaving with retention payments. Or as Republican Senator Snowe put it "Bonuses for what?", the same question the whole country is asking. ...

LyrArc Article Gist
Readers Haven and Harrington comment on the op-ed "Don't Blame Jim Cramer", March 17, in the Washington Post. Jon Stewart took Jim Cramer and CNBC to task for helping inflate the financial bubble with the TV program. A lot of this went on on in all the news programs CNBC and on Bloomberg, as the business news media in their revenue model depend on viewers and advertising revenues, and are not rewarded for good reporting and analysis. Hype and other kinds of promotion, can win better ratings then patient, against the tide reporting and analysis. Reward systems determine the way, humans, media, and other things in our economics system respond. These are essentially unchanged and remain so one bubble after another, tech, housing, credit, on and on.

LyrArc Article Gist
Another view from ecology and environment friendly advocates why the strategy of companies that did not embrace conservation and the environment led to failure. This eco-expert makes a good point about making an eco-footprint for each company as a part of a successful strategy, he cites GE and Walmart as companies doing this. And he significal=ntly points out that there is money to be made doing this.

LyrArc Article Gist
An indication of how much controversy is becoming part of the drug risk appraisal process, involving the medical journals, the FDA, the Congress, the drug companies, the courts, and independent physicians, and the users of the drugs, with charges thrown back and forth. The information on Avandia comes from Merck's own website and was an attempt to provide more public disclosure of drug studies conducted by the manufacturer.

LyrArc Article Gist
Krugman describes the break with orthodox economic policy of the Shinzo Abe government in Japan, and says this is working.

LyrArc Article Gist
Adam Bryant's exceptional piece that provides the essence of the Qualcomm Way. Qualcomm CEO Steven Mollenkompf, describes the high tolerance for uncertainty in which the company and its managers operate. It is better, says Mollenkompf, to take risks when throwing the ball than when holding it, a piece of advice from his father using a basketball analogy. This mean approaching the fire as he puts it, when opportunities arise but less is known about the details and a high degree of uncertainty prevails. Here he describes how he hires and how he evaluates employees giving them a lot of room to learn, as basically mistakes can be corrected in his experience. It is a culture that encourages and makes sure the A's and B's have what is needed to influence things, not to spend energy on bringing a C to a B level. For this to happen rewards are given for the right kind of behaviours, and there is no tolerance for negative behaviours (jerks for example)- smart people have to get along with other smart people and that is important to get the company moving in the right direction. In evaluating he looks at contributions made over a longer period, doing the right things so that the organization takes opportunities and succeeds 5 years from today. Qualcomm's ability to grow in a rapidly changing tech environment and seize opportunities as they arise, may be attributed to this style of management....

LyrArc Article Gist
The International Energy Agency estimates that a price of $100 a barrel would mean U.S. imports of oil at $385 billion, and European Union imports of $375 billion. This is $80 billion in addition spending on oil imports for the U.S. and $76 billion for the E.U., compared to 2010. The impact of a $20 increase in the price of a barrel of oil translates into a 50 cent increase in price per gallon at the gasoline pump. Economic estimates show a drop of 0.5% in GDP growth for the U.S. resulting from such a price increase of $20 per barrel.

LyrArc Article Gist
Gordon points to Roosevelt's experience in 1938 when the Republicans did very well that year in the midterm elections, two years after Roosevelt's decisive wins in 46 states in 1936. The tendency for new administrations to get a lot of the legislative agenda done in the first two years, and the losses in midterms for Wilson, Roosevelt, Reagan and Clinton.