World News Insights
1-3 Minute Gist

All Topics Article

Richly Undeserved

New York Times Original article ›

Keywords:

LyrArc Article Gist
Leonhardt says that there is little reason to think that the flatter rates are better always. With the need to finance Medicare and health care for all, the government can use the extra dollars from taxing the very wealthy, the very rich in different tax brackets. The top bracket in 2008 started at 357,000, and you paid 35% whether you made 400,000, or $4 million, or $40 million. So basically the upper middle class was lumped in with the extremely wealthy. And considering the cost of college tutions for 2 or 3 kids, the upper middle class is only middle class. It makes sense not to lump the two together. Considering that there has been a lot of wealth accumulated at the the very high end, it would also reduce inequality, generate tax revenues for health care, and not have much effect in the incentives for generating economic growth. It is something he says the Obama adminisstration may and should consider.

Flatter U.S. tax rates over $400,000 mean lost revenue and lacking fairness

04/12/2009

The same tax rate for incomes at over $400,000, or over $4 million or $40 million mean lost revenues and do not incorporate fairness, according to this report.

Grouped Articles

Richly Undeserved

New York Times 04/12/2009

Pieces of Silver

The New York Times 08/12/2016

Fairness and equity issues in the U.S. tax system

04/12/2009

Grouped Articles

Richly Undeserved

New York Times 04/12/2009

California Property Taxes Can Vary Wildly in Silicon Valley

New York Times 02/23/2012

The Case for Raising Top Tax Rates

New York Times 03/27/2012

To Reduce Inequality, Tax Wealth, Not Income

New York Times 11/18/2012

Let’s Talk About X

New York Times 11/29/2012

Most Americans Face Lower Tax Burden Than in the 80s

New York Times 11/29/2012

Where the money for a deficit-neutral health care plan will come from, and the environment in which each group is trying to preserve its own interests in the face of a public interest.

09/06/2007

The options to tax employer provided health insurance as income, to reduce tax breaks for mortgage deductions and charitable contributions for highend taxpayers, and to reduce Medicare payments, all have one common problem. Each group would like to preserve as much of the status quo as possible, and give up as least as possible.

Grouped Articles

Heavens, Not Havens

New York Times 04/13/2013

In Holland, Some See Model For U.S. Health-Care System

Wall Street Journal 09/06/2007

Obama's Health Plan -- a Preview

Wall Street Journal 03/04/2008

CEOs Say Stimulus Top Priority

Wall Street Journal 11/19/2008

Obama's War on Obesity

Wall Street Journal 11/22/2008

When a Job Disappears, So Does the Health Care

New York Times 12/07/2008


Support LyrArc

We took a different way to help millions around the world build educated informed mindsets that affects and shapes their lives. For a future that is open, global and digital, with everyone having access to high quality information. We believe in the renewal of America, renewal of Europe, the renewal of India, the rest of Asia, Latin America and Africa. The renewal of our supply chains, health, education, infrastructure, as we rebuild our countries after the pandemic. Literacy and knowledge we believe cannot thrive and grow in a world of web bots, web crawlers, or AI. This requires human curiosity, human learning, and human imagination. We take as inspiration the saying- “One has to be free, and as broad as sky. One has to have a mind that is crystal clear, only then can truth shine in it.” Every contribution whether big or small is precious- in this crisis and ahead.

Support Lyrarc from as small as $1


Copyright © 2006 - 2026 Intelilinks LLC
Terms and Conditions | Copyright Policy | Privacy Policy | Contact Us