LyrArc Article Gist
Does the government need to take on GM's pension fund obligations? Based on the hopeful signs that the GM fund has been managed conservatively with mostly interest earning bond investments and stocks only 26% of the portfolio, and yearly interest exceeding the $7 billion owed to retirees each year, it appears that the GM pension fund for retirees is adequately funded for now. Says Charles Millard , Director of the Pension Guaranty Corporation, " we would maintain that GM can afford to keep its plan intact." The strategy changed after the 2000 tech bubble crash and the shortfalls in 2002. That year GM sold $14 billion of bonds and put in the proceeds of the sale of the Hughes Electronics subsidiary for a total contribution of $18 billion eliminating any shortfalls, and then proceeded to overhaul its investment portfolio replacing stocks with bonds. This is now one of the few bright spots in the GM picture offering a glimmer of hope for resolving the crisis. But were additional burdens to be placed on the obligations through large numbers of early retirements as restructuring goes on for a number of years then this may lead to large shortfalls. Which is why the country and GM and other automakers need to create other new jobs in infrastructure and energy with large infusions of government investment supporting the private sector, like the closed Maytag plant employees in Newton, Iowa who shifted to making wind energy generation wind blades at a new plant that the city attracted. See the link. It also points to the need for rapid action from government and a new management at GM that can bring a new vision and the energy to execute it, to transform the auto business that Detroit plans to hold onto.