LyrArc Article Gist
Kerala has a highly educated people and longevity is over 70 years so the investments and prioritites for health and schools do pay off even with low per capita incomes. On the other hand industrialization and trade are definitely also needed to generate jobs and money for infrastructure to support the industry and jobs. Kerala has addressed that problem in a state with few hopes for employment by sending residents to the Gulf and other parts of the world. About $5 billion in remittances from abroad support the local economy and one in 3 residents depend on this source for income. So definitely Kerala needs to promote free trade. What about tourism? Could Kerala use its coastline and coconut palms fringed rivers and lagoons for a much bigger international tourism than it does now? And foreign investment- is there any reason a state with high educational levels and health standards cannot use these as assets to attract foreign investment to then generate the revenues to build the infrastructure to generate even more and substantial foreign investment, given a change in attitudes that sees trade and foreign investment as beneficial and eventually moves the local economy up the ladder to make more sophisticated products and develop advantages in a global economy? Even countries advanced in industry like japan today are trying to attract foreign investment because it breaks the insular way of looking at things and brings in new ideas given the efforts to attract the right kind of foreign investment that will stimlate the local economy and bring in fresh ways of doing things as well as opportunities for acquiring new technology and knowhow. ...

LyrArc Article Gist
Even though ambitious targets are being set by the government raising from 50 million to 80 million in 3 years the target for new LPG connections to shift rural households from firewood to natural gas use, more needs to be done. The head of the Economic Advisory Council to Prime Minister Modi of India. Bibek Debroy, asks questions about the Ujjwalla program in India to shift rural homes from firewood to gas use. Is the fixed subsidy of Rs 1600 enough? Is a 5kg cylinder what the market wants instead of the 14.2 kg cylinder? Are there externalities that favor use of firewood? Will rural households replace the cylinders at this subsidy level because the costs are still high?  The PMUY, or Pradhan Mantri Ujjwalla Yojana was launched in India in 2016 in Ballia, Uttar Pradesh under the Modi administration. The target for LPG gas use for firewood using households was 15 million in the first year and 50 million for the next 3 years. The government pays Rs. 1600 subsidy for a new connection reimbursing the oil company making the connection. The refill and cost of stove, is the rural household's responsibility. Separate guidelines were made for urban households. The government website mygov.in shows 41 million households have used Ujjwalla to get LPG and stop firewood use. The new target of 80 million means the goal post is moving higher. The 2011 Census is cited showing the rural household use moved up from 6% to 12% by 2011. For All India it was from 17% to 29%. About 100 million rural households use firewood, 62.5% of all rural households in 2011. A big issue is how this affects the health of women using firewood for cooking, and who collects this firewood. Firewood is still cheaper says Debroy, and there are negative externalities associated with firewood not understood enough. Changing the face of rural India is a project in motion, with new issues to tackle, new hurdles to overcome, every bit of progress showing how much more needs to be done. ...