LyrArc Article Gist
New York Appeals Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor, is President Obama's pick for the Supreme Court. Saying that Stomayor had arigorous intellect and a mastery of the law, President Obama went on to say at an announcement ceremony, that the judge's inspiring story was crucial in his decision. One that was made with deep reflection and careful deliberation. Obama quoted Justice Oliver Wendell Homes- "the life of the law has not beenlogic, it has been experience." And added his own words to those of Holmes- its vital that ajustice know "how the world works, and how ordinary people live." Sotomayor is from the Bronx part of New York City. Her parents immigrated from Puerto Rico and lived in a poor neighborhood. Her mother worked six day weeks to earn enough money to send her and a brother to Catholic school. From there she got into Princeton University, where she once felt like "a vistor landing in an alien country," but graduated summa cum laude. She went on to Yale law school, where she was editor of the Yale Law Journal, workwed for Robert Morgenthau in the district attorney's office in New York and later went into private practice. She was nominated by the first President Bush in 1991 to the federal appeals court on the advice of Senator Patrick Moynihan, and then by Bill Clinton to the appeals court in 1997. Judge Sotomayor takes pride in her ethnicity, gender and growing up in the poor part of the Bronx, and said in a2002 lecture- " I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who has'nt lived that life."...

LyrArc Article Gist
Stephen Carter at Yale Law School, and Sonia Sotomayor on the Appeals Court of New York, share the idea that a judges's experiences will have an impact on what and how he or she see things, and there is virtue in that impact. And those individual experiences are unique to that person, what makes her who she is , and are to some extent idiosyncratic or special to that person. This adds to the law rather than than detracts from it, by adding to the richness of experience. If the life of the law is experience and it is informed by it, then the richness of experiences on the bench only add to the richness of insight brought to bear in making the decision. Sotomayor explains this in the light of her own experiences, but others could have done so also. And no two women are the same. Justice O'Connor's experiences growing up in the frontier on an Arizona ranch and taking part in ranch activities are just unique, there is just no one like her in the supreme court past and present. The same is true of this Newyorkican (puertorican form the Bronx). These individual experiences temper the sense of shared perception of womanhood, and criss cross over cultural lines in so may ways, that there is no typical black, no typical white and no typical Hispanic, especially in today's heterogenous mix of communities in America. Try a Puerto Rican who can't speak Spanish and doesn't know what tacos are like....

LyrArc Article Gist
The Washington Post editorial says there is much to admire in Sotomayor's life and achievements in the law. She would make awelcome fresh perspective to the bench says the WPOst, considering the variety and diversity of experience she brings that does not exist on the Supreme Court. But says the WPOst Senators should ask her questions relating to impartiality and making policy while on the bench.

LyrArc Article Gist
The 45 million Latinos in the USA react with pride, and some parents talk to their daughters to see her as a role model. From Salvadoran immigrants, and Cuban immigrants to Mexican immigrants, to people in the Bronz and Puerto Rico. Demographic research by the Pew Hispanic Center shows that Hispanics are from many countries and have a diversity of opinions and attitudes. Two thirds voted for Obama, one third for McCain, 60% are native-born and 40% foreign born, 64% are of Mexican AMerican heritage, and the other 36% are from Cuba, Puerto Rico, Central America, and other places. They make up 15% of the USA population, and account for half of the country's population growth in the last decade.

LyrArc Article Gist
"Empathy" was a word not used by Obama but was an idea that was persistent in his selection. From the East Room Obama told the American public- "experience being tested by obstacles and barriers, by hardhip and misfortune; experience insisting, perisisting and ultimately overcoming those barriers; is necessary ingredient in the kind of justice we need on the Supreme Court." Sotomayor responded- "This wealth of experiences, personal and professional, have helped meappreciate the variety of perspectivs that present themselves in every case that I hear." While empathy and astory line similar to the President's is clear in this case; for a Latina whose mother struggled like Obama's to get her through school, and who did well at Princeton and Yale Law School; there is also the same degree of excellence in rigorous study of the law and sharp intellect, and good judgement. This was Obama's first criteria before empathy. And even though Justice Roberts is quoted here as saying in his confirmation hearings that he saw the role of a judge as an umpire, calling balls and strikes, Roberts is still going to see the balls and the strikes through his own set of experiences. Which in this case he generalizes without knowing it or consciously realizing it, as the set of experiences common to all. His is an aspiration to impartiality no more than Sotomayor's, except that Sotomayor is conscious of her experiences, because she has as she says spent a large part of her life looking over her shoulder as an outsider Newyorkican does; and Roberts the insider isn't. ...

LyrArc Article Gist
The Supreme Court's ruling against Wyeth knocks down a 2006 Bush administration regulation which declared that permitting product-liability law suits conflicted with "FDA's role "as the expert federal agency responsible for evaluating and regulating drugs." Justice Paul Stevens writing the majority opinion said the Bush position is "entitled to no weight, and was "inherently suspect because no evidence was given in support of its position and the states and the public did not get an opportunity to comment before it was issued. Wyeth had argued that it met FDA guidelines in the label for its antinausea drug Phenergan, and wasn't liable when a 63 year old guitar player lost her arm after receiving the drug.

LyrArc Article Gist
This editorial in Feb. 2016 in the Washington Post says Scalia's interpretation of the original intent of the writers of the U.S. Constitution, by testing contemporary liberal ideas and controlling liberal excesses, helped strengthen the changes in the law.

LyrArc Article Gist
Lane says Roberts was influenced in his thinking by Daniel Webster. In 1976 Roberts wrote a biography of Webster that won the undergraduate writing prize at Harvard. Roberts particularly valued the spirit of dispassionate compromise and staying above the politics of the day that Webster displayed at the time. It is clear from the opinion written by Roberts that the real deciding influence was that of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.

LyrArc Article Gist
Legal aspects and challenges to the Obama healthcare law that may have been overlooked by the Obama administration.

LyrArc Article Gist
How Google searches by Supreme Court justices brings up information used in deciding cases before the Supreme Court. The widespread use of searches in research by justices.

LyrArc Article Gist
A major shift in public opinion happened between 1990 in the public's perception and tolerance of gay people and gay marraige. Support for gay marraige in Journal/NBC News polling shows young people, especially people 18-34 year old, were leading the way. In this group support for gay marraigne increased from 47% in 2009 to 57% in 2012, going up to 74% in March 2015. The increase is also shown in suburban residents, political independents, Midwesterners and Hispanics. A key factor in the change is that many people now know of one person in their work or personal lives who is gay. Technology, television and internet media also helped changed attitudes. In 1990 7 of 8 Americans said sexual relations between the same sex were wrong. In 2004 only 3 of ten Americans supported same sex marraige. A vote in Maine shows the dramatic shift- in 2009 same sex marraige was rejected by 53%, in 2012 53% approved it. The change in attitudes is faster than happened for miscegenation, which took 30 years after the Supreme Court ruled against anti-miscegenation laws to reach a point where a majority of Americans approved marraiges between black and white people. The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on June 25, 2015, now makes gay marraige legal in all 50 states, and strikes down bans in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Yet there are a significant number of Americans who do not favor same sex marraige especially in southern states such as Texas, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama. A Pew Research Center poll shows 73% of white evangelical Protestants do not approve of same sex marraige. Other groups who do not favor same sex marraige in the Pew polling are conservatives and persons born before the post World War baby boom. ...